Once a great place—now lost to politics and poor leadership.
Workday used to offer an excellent work-life balance, a genuine employee-first culture, and solid compensation (base + RSUs + bonus). Unfortunately, much of that has eroded.
Internal politics now run unchecked, with toxic dev team leaders protected instead of held accountable. Senior management often avoids conflict resolution, acting more like messengers than leaders. The company feels increasingly misaligned—favoring dysfunction over collaboration. It’s disheartening to see such a promising workplace lose its core values. I'm out due to politics, will never return to this org.
A culture of politics over performance.
My experience at Workday was marked by poor leadership accountability and a lack of effective conflict resolution. Toxic behavior among certain dev team leads was tolerated, if not rewarded, while management failed to intervene or foster a collaborative culture. Senior leaders often took a passive stance—acting more as messengers than problem-solvers—leaving high-performing teams vulnerable to internal sabotage. If you're someone who values transparency, fairness, and leadership that actually leads, tread carefully.
Advice to HR:
When individual contributors raise concerns, listen and act. Too often, ICs get caught in the crossfire of internal politics, especially in cross-functional environments, with little to no support from leadership. Management's inaction sends a message that toxic behavior is tolerated.
There's one particular org within Workday where dysfunction and toxicity are rampant—it urgently needs cultural intervention and a leadership reset. Ignoring these issues doesn’t just hurt morale—it drives away good people.
The interview took place on campus a few days after our school's career fair. The interview was well organized and took about 45 minutes. The interviewer asked about my resume and proceeded to ask me questions about: * The projects I worked on * H
I attended the job fair at UCSD and spoke with a recruiter for about five minutes. A few days later, I received a phone call asking if I could come in the following week for an interview, which I accepted. It was a quick, 30-minute interview with on
It's a very lengthy process. Recruiters are not that responsive. You have to keep sending them emails to either schedule interviews or ask about feedback. Some recruiters will respond quickly after we send them an email, but others don’t respond at
The interview took place on campus a few days after our school's career fair. The interview was well organized and took about 45 minutes. The interviewer asked about my resume and proceeded to ask me questions about: * The projects I worked on * H
I attended the job fair at UCSD and spoke with a recruiter for about five minutes. A few days later, I received a phone call asking if I could come in the following week for an interview, which I accepted. It was a quick, 30-minute interview with on
It's a very lengthy process. Recruiters are not that responsive. You have to keep sending them emails to either schedule interviews or ask about feedback. Some recruiters will respond quickly after we send them an email, but others don’t respond at