Good technical infrastructure despite being written in Perl. I would give Yahoo! 2 1/2 stars if it were available. Despite the poor management culture, there were some strong developers and the deployment system was one of the best I've seen.
Very poor management culture. The emphasis was entirely on what was needed to advance careers rather than provide an excellent product for the customer. Poor decision-making occurred in technical challenges. If you can keep your head down and not get involved in politics, it might be a decent place to work.
Wipe the slate clean? There seemed to be a 'sinking ship, grab what you can to pad your resume' for the next job atmosphere. This is the primary reason for the low score.
I applied through their career portal, and within the week, I had a phone screening. A week following that, I had a technical phone screening with a member of the team they were trying to hire for. And now, a week after that, I am going in for an in-
Robbed me of two months of my time! The interview process was straightforward: apply online, get called within a week for a phone screen, and then onsite interviews within the next two weeks. This was followed by a hellacious ordeal regarding the de
I had two phone interviews, both including technical questions, such as algorithms and background discussions. They were not very difficult. The onsite interview was held with four people. The questions on the onsite were also not very difficult whe
I applied through their career portal, and within the week, I had a phone screening. A week following that, I had a technical phone screening with a member of the team they were trying to hire for. And now, a week after that, I am going in for an in-
Robbed me of two months of my time! The interview process was straightforward: apply online, get called within a week for a phone screen, and then onsite interviews within the next two weeks. This was followed by a hellacious ordeal regarding the de
I had two phone interviews, both including technical questions, such as algorithms and background discussions. They were not very difficult. The onsite interview was held with four people. The questions on the onsite were also not very difficult whe