Great work culture and engineering culture, with excellent staff. Much of management works to ensure individual contributors have a career trajectory built into assignments and duties.
Retention is important for Yahoo!, and so there's significant focus on maintaining work/life balance, and training and keeping excellent engineers on-staff.
Tooling and technologies are great. Lots of projects and ability to transition around to keep things interesting.
If you want to have a well-paying job, top-notch benefits, and build large-scale web chops, this is an excellent place to do it.
Yahoo has major challenges in its search for identity and success in 2011. Uncertainty at the executive level, considering we have a new "interim" CEO, however, is likely to be positive for the company on the whole. There is an enormous amount of success here but it feels overshadowed in the press. Most folks detach from the public image of Yahoo! and focus on doing great work. :)
I applied through the career website and had a phone interview one month after. I was asked resume-related questions and was invited to an onsite interview on that same day. The onsite interview consisted of 4 technical interview rounds. Two month
Applied in Career Fair, had an on-campus interview. Three weeks later, had a second phone interview. The first one was pretty good. The interviewer was very friendly. The second interview was terrible. The interviewer had a strong accent, and most
After a phone screening, I got an on-site interview. There were basically three rounds with three different people on the same day. Each round was geared towards different directions. * The first round focused on basic algorithms. * The second w
I applied through the career website and had a phone interview one month after. I was asked resume-related questions and was invited to an onsite interview on that same day. The onsite interview consisted of 4 technical interview rounds. Two month
Applied in Career Fair, had an on-campus interview. Three weeks later, had a second phone interview. The first one was pretty good. The interviewer was very friendly. The second interview was terrible. The interviewer had a strong accent, and most
After a phone screening, I got an on-site interview. There were basically three rounds with three different people on the same day. Each round was geared towards different directions. * The first round focused on basic algorithms. * The second w