The recent 4 and 5 star rating stating no cons are really suspicious.
As soon as there are a few negative reviews, people rush to give their glowing 5 star reviews.
The negative reviews tell the true story of what's happening inside the company.
Zeta is an average company with above-average hype.
The caliber of work is about normal and nothing that you would not find in other companies.
Management at Zeta is below average.
Top management especially lacks experience and think engineers and middle managers are the problem.
Their experiment with Nova failed badly due to inept top management and wrong strategy.
There's rampant nepotism where relatives of VPs get roles beyond their competence levels and experienced people get blamed for any delays and failures.
No wonder then that people leave for better environments.
People who have been in the company for more than 3-4 years get away for their mistakes with nothing more than a mild reproach from the CTO.
Many of them try to hide their mistakes and blame the new people for not understanding the functionalities.
How can they understand if the documentation is misleading and the old timers don't respond to questions?
Stay away from this company.
Be more professional. You already know who the incompetent people are, and you should weed them out.
The first-round DSA interview: I had shared optimal solutions to both problems, but I haven't received any update yet. It’s disappointing not to get any feedback, especially after investing time and effort. The interview panel was significantly less
I applied in-person. There were around three rounds of interviews: - Designing - Algorithms - Peer coding The designing round was interactive and fun. The other two rounds were not very interactive and seemed like mugged-up solutions. There were qu
I applied online. The process took two weeks. There are a total of three rounds. The first and second rounds focused on pure JavaScript. In the first two seconds, they were asking questions related to JavaScript and giving problems like caching, clo
The first-round DSA interview: I had shared optimal solutions to both problems, but I haven't received any update yet. It’s disappointing not to get any feedback, especially after investing time and effort. The interview panel was significantly less
I applied in-person. There were around three rounds of interviews: - Designing - Algorithms - Peer coding The designing round was interactive and fun. The other two rounds were not very interactive and seemed like mugged-up solutions. There were qu
I applied online. The process took two weeks. There are a total of three rounds. The first and second rounds focused on pure JavaScript. In the first two seconds, they were asking questions related to JavaScript and giving problems like caching, clo