The people are amazing: passionate, competent, quirky, and interesting.
The perks are fantastic.
The rapid growth makes it a great place to learn, as you're constantly solving new technical and social problems.
You can really own your impact and find the best projects for yourself. This requires being able to argue for your point of view, but learning how to do that is a great opportunity in itself.
The company really does care about the users and has a fundamentally positive impact on the world.
The office is crazy crowded, which can make it hard to focus. Hiring lots of new grads means a lot of time is spent answering questions and trying to train the recruits. Also, the interview load is pretty heavy. People tend to work a lot, so it can be hard to define boundaries and disconnect.
First and foremost, trust your people! There's no need to personally involve yourself in every project.
Let people work on what's viable instead of coming up with dozens of pie-in-the-sky ideas while leaving basic problems unsolved.
Focus on the core experience, which still needs a lot of work.
The interview process was fairly typical: * 20-30 minute call with a recruiter to discuss the role and next steps. * 45-minute phone call with an engineer. For my interview, this wasn't typical coding trivia. Instead, we went over a practical co
The first two stages were a take-home HackerRank easy question, followed by two HackerRank medium questions over webcam. I didn't get past that stage. The interview was reasonably challenging, and the recruiter was very communicative. The process we
Phone screen, then an onsite interview in San Francisco. The onsite consisted of: * 2 culture interviews * 3 technical interviews * 1 experience interview The technical interviews involved solving toy problems. One of them was intended to be
The interview process was fairly typical: * 20-30 minute call with a recruiter to discuss the role and next steps. * 45-minute phone call with an engineer. For my interview, this wasn't typical coding trivia. Instead, we went over a practical co
The first two stages were a take-home HackerRank easy question, followed by two HackerRank medium questions over webcam. I didn't get past that stage. The interview was reasonably challenging, and the recruiter was very communicative. The process we
Phone screen, then an onsite interview in San Francisco. The onsite consisted of: * 2 culture interviews * 3 technical interviews * 1 experience interview The technical interviews involved solving toy problems. One of them was intended to be