A big pool of projects. Decent learning infra. Supportive management.
Need to work more on annual increment, employee retention program, and cafeteria.
No advice for management as of now.
It was good. Three rounds of interviews were conducted. The first level was core technical. The second level was techno-managerial. In the first round, questions were deeper in terms of technology, whereas in the managerial round, the questions were
I received a call from a recruiter who informed me that although the interview description stated 'architect,' the role was for both developers and architects. As an Azure developer, I agreed to proceed. On the day of the interview, it was a video c
Very poor. They don't go by candidate profile; they have their own calculation. If they decide to reject you, they will ask more irrelevant questions. HR is very uninformed, and interviews are just a joke. They have very poor management.
It was good. Three rounds of interviews were conducted. The first level was core technical. The second level was techno-managerial. In the first round, questions were deeper in terms of technology, whereas in the managerial round, the questions were
I received a call from a recruiter who informed me that although the interview description stated 'architect,' the role was for both developers and architects. As an Azure developer, I agreed to proceed. On the day of the interview, it was a video c
Very poor. They don't go by candidate profile; they have their own calculation. If they decide to reject you, they will ask more irrelevant questions. HR is very uninformed, and interviews are just a joke. They have very poor management.