Great people and flat structure. Mobility across internal group and national boundaries. Freedom to develop personal direction and value contribution within the business. Diversity of work. Good grad programme and great for learning about what IT architecture is all about.
Rubbish internal systems, including those for review and development. The process for career progression once past middle grades seems designed to be as difficult as possible. Churn of branding and organisational structure is disorienting. Limited opportunities to be really stretched (and therefore exceed expectations) on projects. The range of available projects is often limited. Focus on utilisation produces a body shop mentality at times.
Fix internal systems.
- Completed one technical interview and one manager round. (The manager asked about my expected CTC, even though he was not supposed to know.) - An HR representative (who looked like an intern) called to discuss salary and asked why my expectations w
After the initial HR level discussion, I had to undergo two rounds of technical discussion. Finally, I got into a session with HR about compensation. I had to undergo the verification test and document upload. Post this, I received the offer.
The interview process is good, with a technical round, a managerial round, and an HR round. The technical interviewer has good knowledge of the practical reasoning behind the questions asked. In-depth questions were asked, starting from basics to re
- Completed one technical interview and one manager round. (The manager asked about my expected CTC, even though he was not supposed to know.) - An HR representative (who looked like an intern) called to discuss salary and asked why my expectations w
After the initial HR level discussion, I had to undergo two rounds of technical discussion. Finally, I got into a session with HR about compensation. I had to undergo the verification test and document upload. Post this, I received the offer.
The interview process is good, with a technical round, a managerial round, and an HR round. The technical interviewer has good knowledge of the practical reasoning behind the questions asked. In-depth questions were asked, starting from basics to re