Small teams, decent autonomy, modern tech, smart people.
Understaffed, overworked, struggling to hire.
Leadership talks about how important every initiative and project is, but where is the funding and the people power to do it? Are we serious about innovating, or not? And if we really want to attract FANG-quality talent, we need to pay like FANG does. That will solve our hiring challenges. Duh.
First, a small multiple-choice test. Then, one hour with a lead architect. Final round. Four interviews, 60 minutes each. The interview questions were around algorithms, mentorship, and architecture. The interviews had 60-minute gaps in between
1st Round - Online Test 2nd Round - Technical Phone Screen 3rd Round - In-office. 2 Devs, 2 Devs, VP, Director Overall, a rather pleasant interview. Some technical, some personality. All seemed well, except for the Director, who seemed like the
A quick 15-minute phone screening, one behavioral interview based on their principles, and one technical interview in a language of your choosing (a LeetCode easy/medium). It was not very hard, and the interviewers were nice.
First, a small multiple-choice test. Then, one hour with a lead architect. Final round. Four interviews, 60 minutes each. The interview questions were around algorithms, mentorship, and architecture. The interviews had 60-minute gaps in between
1st Round - Online Test 2nd Round - Technical Phone Screen 3rd Round - In-office. 2 Devs, 2 Devs, VP, Director Overall, a rather pleasant interview. Some technical, some personality. All seemed well, except for the Director, who seemed like the
A quick 15-minute phone screening, one behavioral interview based on their principles, and one technical interview in a language of your choosing (a LeetCode easy/medium). It was not very hard, and the interviewers were nice.