Great company for work-life balance. Benefits offered by the company are very good. Lots of opportunities to learn new things. Financial rewards for top performers are present and given at regular intervals. Competitive base salary.
Company and business units move very slowly.
Products are very mature, so most projects are more of the same.
Focus is more on buying technology rather than developing in-house.
Promotion and career advancement is not easy but not improbable.
Attrition is present, so opportunities do crop up.
I had a phone screen with one of the leads, which moved on to an onsite interview. Scheduling took some time, which you can expect. For the onsite, I had four interviews: * One coding * One behavioral * One system design * A final HM round, which wa
The interview process spanned 4 hours. Each round lasted 45 minutes and included: * Two rounds of coding * One round of analytics There was also a manager round with general discussion. A lunch break was provided, during which I was accompanied b
The onsite interview involved a total of 5 people, including the team lead and the hiring manager. It took about 4 hours. They covered a wide range of topics, including coding, testing, CI/CD, and automation. I performed well in three of the inter
I had a phone screen with one of the leads, which moved on to an onsite interview. Scheduling took some time, which you can expect. For the onsite, I had four interviews: * One coding * One behavioral * One system design * A final HM round, which wa
The interview process spanned 4 hours. Each round lasted 45 minutes and included: * Two rounds of coding * One round of analytics There was also a manager round with general discussion. A lunch break was provided, during which I was accompanied b
The onsite interview involved a total of 5 people, including the team lead and the hiring manager. It took about 4 hours. They covered a wide range of topics, including coding, testing, CI/CD, and automation. I performed well in three of the inter