Good technology exposure.
Good place to learn.
Worst place to work when it comes to work-life balance. Management never stresses on quality of work; they just want some work done. In the process, employees struggle with too much of sustenance. Constant fire-fighting as deadlines are never realistic. Not at all rewarding.
Let engineers decide when it is best to complete a feature.
I had a phone screen with one of the leads, which moved on to an onsite interview. Scheduling took some time, which you can expect. For the onsite, I had four interviews: * One coding * One behavioral * One system design * A final HM round, which wa
The interview process spanned 4 hours. Each round lasted 45 minutes and included: * Two rounds of coding * One round of analytics There was also a manager round with general discussion. A lunch break was provided, during which I was accompanied b
The onsite interview involved a total of 5 people, including the team lead and the hiring manager. It took about 4 hours. They covered a wide range of topics, including coding, testing, CI/CD, and automation. I performed well in three of the inter
I had a phone screen with one of the leads, which moved on to an onsite interview. Scheduling took some time, which you can expect. For the onsite, I had four interviews: * One coding * One behavioral * One system design * A final HM round, which wa
The interview process spanned 4 hours. Each round lasted 45 minutes and included: * Two rounds of coding * One round of analytics There was also a manager round with general discussion. A lunch break was provided, during which I was accompanied b
The onsite interview involved a total of 5 people, including the team lead and the hiring manager. It took about 4 hours. They covered a wide range of topics, including coding, testing, CI/CD, and automation. I performed well in three of the inter