Great company, solid structure. Genuinely appears to care about morals company-wide.
Employee onboarding is nonexistent. Employees are left to struggle to find out where any documentation is, to figure out how to access projects, files, or assistance with anything. Employees are left to tread water while a dozen weights are thrown on top of them. They cannot discard them as they are needed to keep the job, but they cannot use them because no one explains anything. I had to beg for tasks. Maybe I was lucky to get something where one supervisor and two leads had varying degrees of understanding of what the task was, as it was a one-line description. Each had their different expectations, none discussed. Trying to meet the needs, which varied greatly among them, leads you to getting nothing done due to running in circles and not meeting one person's requirements because the others conflicted.
Yup, while getting paid to run in circles and do nothing is fun. I felt utterly useless while I was there, which resulted in me getting laid off for lack of quality work, from lack of good supervision, lack of direction, and lack of scoping.
Consolidate the scoping down to one person, provide details of the expectations, and actually help your employees when they are stuck rather than passing the buck until it's too late.
I had a phone screen with one of the leads, which moved on to an onsite interview. Scheduling took some time, which you can expect. For the onsite, I had four interviews: * One coding * One behavioral * One system design * A final HM round, which wa
The interview process spanned 4 hours. Each round lasted 45 minutes and included: * Two rounds of coding * One round of analytics There was also a manager round with general discussion. A lunch break was provided, during which I was accompanied b
The onsite interview involved a total of 5 people, including the team lead and the hiring manager. It took about 4 hours. They covered a wide range of topics, including coding, testing, CI/CD, and automation. I performed well in three of the inter
I had a phone screen with one of the leads, which moved on to an onsite interview. Scheduling took some time, which you can expect. For the onsite, I had four interviews: * One coding * One behavioral * One system design * A final HM round, which wa
The interview process spanned 4 hours. Each round lasted 45 minutes and included: * Two rounds of coding * One round of analytics There was also a manager round with general discussion. A lunch break was provided, during which I was accompanied b
The onsite interview involved a total of 5 people, including the team lead and the hiring manager. It took about 4 hours. They covered a wide range of topics, including coding, testing, CI/CD, and automation. I performed well in three of the inter