Cisco is a great place to balance work and everyday life or your side interests. Working from home is accepted. You can take a long lunch break and disappear for a few hours; nobody will notice. There is plenty of vacation, and the salary is decent compared to the work you are required to do. It's a big name in the networking business, and if you are smart enough, you can learn a lot. There are plenty of opportunities to learn with online and real classes.
The level and quality of engineering is overall pretty low, lower than many other companies. Many people still use the same tools as they used 30 years ago.
Others are jealous of what they know and try not to share it with anybody (job security?!?).
Process is very, very long and frustrating. With 60k employees, it sometimes takes a week to do a 1-hour job. This all explains why many products are coming from acquisitions and are not developed internally.
There is no diversity at all in engineering. I would guess 90% is from India (maybe more).
Also, from the level of director going up, many are "retired." They are just interested in getting their bonus and consider sending random emails at random hours (with their BlackBerry and similar) a valid proof that they are working around the clock.
There are not many chances to improve your career once you get on board in terms of salary or promotion. Negotiate well before signing, or you might just get stuck with something that you really do not like.
Also, watch out on where you end up going. You might be forced to just do fire fighting and bug fixing and no development (almost at all). That's not good for your resume and it's not good for your mind.
Diversity, innovation: focus on those two, or Cisco will just become a very boring place to work.
I came in through the 2007 Choice Program. I met a recruiter at university, had a 1:1 interview, and was then scheduled to come on-site for an interview with three engineers. The questions were very easy, probably because they wanted to attract young
* A quick phone interview, a basic resume review, and a couple of quick OS questions. * Six one-hour sessions on Webex. All interviews were conducted remotely. * The questions were easy. * It took a long time to get an offer, but it was accepted in t
The process was straightforward. I spoke with four technical members of the team and two managers. The questions were technical, focusing on areas I had already reviewed. They also discussed programming. Fit was an important area they discussed. Th
I came in through the 2007 Choice Program. I met a recruiter at university, had a 1:1 interview, and was then scheduled to come on-site for an interview with three engineers. The questions were very easy, probably because they wanted to attract young
* A quick phone interview, a basic resume review, and a couple of quick OS questions. * Six one-hour sessions on Webex. All interviews were conducted remotely. * The questions were easy. * It took a long time to get an offer, but it was accepted in t
The process was straightforward. I spoke with four technical members of the team and two managers. The questions were technical, focusing on areas I had already reviewed. They also discussed programming. Fit was an important area they discussed. Th