The interview process was an absolute mockery.

First, there was an HR interview. Then, another interview with a PM. After that, there was a take-home test, and then another three interviews were lined up.

Now, why was this a disaster? Simply put: after investing time in the first two interviews and a few hours into the exercise, I was told that they expected more time to be dedicated and more content to be written in the test. I wouldn't have minded this if they hadn't requested more of what was already done. A test should demonstrate the ability to write code correctly and cleanly, not to have someone write production-ready code to be used afterward. Some of the feedback was also incorrect, claiming I did things I hadn't, and basically nit-picking for the sake of nit-picking.

To add on top of that, I think it's extremely rude and hypocritical to claim I should have spent more time when they took two work weeks to get back to me. The cherry on top? They claim they're worth the time because they're such a big company and generally give no second thought to the fact that you already have a job and free time (so much for work-life balance).

Overall, I am under the impression that they don't value their candidates. They compare themselves to Google, while Google actually respects its candidates and their time investments.

Take-home exercises that they expect you to spend hours getting ready, while they take their sweet time (two weeks) to look over it.

Questions about your experience.