Spoke in 4 rounds with about a total of 50 people.
Seems Goldman's process is very longwinded, involving a lot of people not that relevant to the actual position.
Lots of overlap between questions. Quality of people varies a lot. Some did not do a good job at selling Goldman.
Pretty cool place with some smart people, but I was surprised how they are very good at one thing and average at another (the technology infrastructure is very uneven).
Recommend you try this place, but you need stamina for the interviews.
What is the complexity of heapsort, and why?
How about the worst case?
When is Value at Risk inappropriate?
The following metrics were computed from 4 interview experiences for the Goldman Sachs Engineering role in New York, New York.
Goldman Sachs's interview process for their Engineering roles in New York, New York is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having mixed feelings for Goldman Sachs's Engineering interview process in New York, New York.