Very smart and helpful colleagues. A plethora of cool technologies. A large amount of trust in the employees; even interns have access to a lot of confidential material.
Steep learning curve for the technologies used.
Many projects still use C++, which lacks good tool support.
Once in a while, there is a reorganization of projects, which is annoying to be held up by.
Differences in interview practices from office to office.
The recruiter was clear with their communication. The technical interviewer was difficult to collaborate with. I think they were actually working and not paying attention. For the entire time I spoke, there was no feedback, unlike in Google's exampl
Not recommended. There were two stages of LeetCode questions. After that, there was no review. A month later, I called them, and they congratulated me, stating I had passed the reviews. Since then, they have gone silent.
I completed a phone screen with the recruiter, followed by a phone interview with a current engineer. The phone interview involved discussing technical concepts and coding collaboratively in a Google Doc, which the engineer also had open. While the
The recruiter was clear with their communication. The technical interviewer was difficult to collaborate with. I think they were actually working and not paying attention. For the entire time I spoke, there was no feedback, unlike in Google's exampl
Not recommended. There were two stages of LeetCode questions. After that, there was no review. A month later, I called them, and they congratulated me, stating I had passed the reviews. Since then, they have gone silent.
I completed a phone screen with the recruiter, followed by a phone interview with a current engineer. The phone interview involved discussing technical concepts and coding collaboratively in a Google Doc, which the engineer also had open. While the