I applied online a few weeks ago. I did the IPAT test. All questions were related to logical and numerical aspects. The questions themselves were not difficult, but the time was very short, only 2:15 minutes for each question. They told me I passed the IPAT test yesterday. However, they emailed me this morning stating that after reviewing my application, their company has high standards and cannot proceed with my application to the next stage.

I phoned them to ask for feedback, but they weren't very friendly or patient. They said they were unable to provide any feedback because there were too many applications. It is not easy to apply for a role with them; it took me half a day to fill out their application form and another day to prepare for the IPAT test.

If I hadn't passed the test, I could totally understand their rejection. But I passed it, and then they told me I wasn't good enough. Shouldn't they have looked at the application form first? Why is it impossible for them to offer a reason for rejection, which would only cost them a few minutes after I spent about two days on it?

This was the worst interview experience I've had.

A company bought twice as many small envelopes as large envelopes. It used up 6/11 of the small envelopes and 1/3 of the large envelopes. What fraction of the total number was left unused?

If a certain computer is capable of printing 4,400 monthly credit card bills per hour, while a new model is capable of printing at a rate of 7,000 per hour, the old model will take approximately how much longer than the new model to print 10,800 bills?

37, 73, 9, 49, 58, 85, 25, 64, 29, 92, ? -> 4 -> 12 -> 16 -> 18 -> 81