In IBM, you can BS your way around if you're into that. There are too many people working on PowerPoint slides and very little on actual products. That is normally a negative unless you're one of the 90% who dial into conference calls 60% of the day while daydreaming.
Too many incapable people thinking they're good. Bands (promoted levels) are very inadequate to assess a person's ability to deliver. I've seen too many senior level or higher employees who are just average and not more.
Get rid of the band system. Past (usually unfair) promotions say nothing about the ability of anybody in this company.
Interviewed with two different hiring managers and four team members. Overall, it went well. Was very impressed with the working environment: labs, people, and etc. The questions asked were real-world questions, not from a book. Some were very tec
Easy interview. Questions on past projects. Some math/logic test like GRE/SAT.
What do you like about software?
Interviewed with two different hiring managers and four team members. Overall, it went well. Was very impressed with the working environment: labs, people, and etc. The questions asked were real-world questions, not from a book. Some were very tec
Easy interview. Questions on past projects. Some math/logic test like GRE/SAT.
What do you like about software?