Good money and fully remote
Really poor senior leadership and decision-making.
A 45-minute technical phone screen, followed by an onsite interview. The onsite included three back-to-back, hour-long whiteboarding sessions with no time in between, and then a 1.5-hour HackerRank-style coding challenge.
Phone screen, then invited for an onsite interview. Three-hour face-to-face meeting with a group of people, from the manager to team members. First started with real coding, then whiteboard coding. The process and questions were well organized, an
They gave me the option of a phone screening followed by an all-day battery of whiteboard and HackerRank problems, or two on-site days with the whiteboard and HackerRank problems split between the two days.
A 45-minute technical phone screen, followed by an onsite interview. The onsite included three back-to-back, hour-long whiteboarding sessions with no time in between, and then a 1.5-hour HackerRank-style coding challenge.
Phone screen, then invited for an onsite interview. Three-hour face-to-face meeting with a group of people, from the manager to team members. First started with real coding, then whiteboard coding. The process and questions were well organized, an
They gave me the option of a phone screening followed by an all-day battery of whiteboard and HackerRank problems, or two on-site days with the whiteboard and HackerRank problems split between the two days.