It started with a LinkedIn recruiter contacting me for a leadership position. This was followed by a basic technical questionnaire and then two one-hour phone interviews, including a coding exercise. The next stage was an onsite interview that included their standard six modules. The interview experience was very great until then.
What followed completely surprised me, and I lost all respect for the company. I was called in for a second onsite interview with management, which went on for over five hours. I did really well and thought I was in.
I was totally surprised when they said they found me too "strong" and hence wouldn't hire me. The very next day, they promoted their internal candidate to the manager position I was being interviewed for. That employee was one of the people who had interviewed me!
This is totally unethical. It is a complete shame that a company that prides itself on building solutions for job seekers has no respect for human emotions. I wasted my time obsessing over this company and making thorough preparation for the interview. It broke my heart.
The live troubleshooting of the Apache web server was a little tricky.
This has been documented by another interviewer.
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the LinkedIn Site Reliability Engineering Manager role in Mountain View, California.
LinkedIn's interview process for their Site Reliability Engineering Manager roles in Mountain View, California is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for LinkedIn's Site Reliability Engineering Manager interview process in Mountain View, California.