My team is humble, supportive, and hard-working. Everyone I work with is at the top of their field (design, user research, product, engineering) and are also genuinely amazing human beings. Meta continuously supports me as a people manager with high autonomy, training, tools, and leadership opportunities. This means I'm always doing my best work and growing in my career.
Leadership is extremely transparent about goals and challenges. Even amid layoffs, communication is frequent, direct, and gets right to the heart of difficult topics.
Bottoms-up decision-making sometimes makes goals fuzzy and can lead to duplication of efforts in separate orgs. You need a high tolerance for ambiguity to thrive at Meta. Public opinion of Meta is often unbalanced, with lots of uninformed opinions.
Continue to focus on the long-term, and we'll be fine.
A recruiter reached out to me via LinkedIn. The recruiter screen had general questions about my background and if I had ever fired someone. The second round was scheduled two weeks out. It included one System Design/Product Architecture round and an
A great and very well-structured process. The recruiter was extremely savvy about the whole process, the group, and the job requirements. The interview stages were: * Recruiter round * Phone screen * Virtual onsite round Questions were to the poin
The process was very well organized. Most of the interviewers were really nice people, and we had a very good discussion. The only exception was one interviewer for the Project retrospective. He was 15-20 minutes late. To cover all his questions, he
A recruiter reached out to me via LinkedIn. The recruiter screen had general questions about my background and if I had ever fired someone. The second round was scheduled two weeks out. It included one System Design/Product Architecture round and an
A great and very well-structured process. The recruiter was extremely savvy about the whole process, the group, and the job requirements. The interview stages were: * Recruiter round * Phone screen * Virtual onsite round Questions were to the poin
The process was very well organized. Most of the interviewers were really nice people, and we had a very good discussion. The only exception was one interviewer for the Project retrospective. He was 15-20 minutes late. To cover all his questions, he