Microsoft is great.
I left to learn more from another company, but [it offered] huge scale, hard problems to solve, pretty good autonomy, and relatively few barriers to success.
I would work there again.
Charter conflicts still happen. Some processes are burdensome. The review process is a little cumbersome and at times feels a little artificial, but generally you can "do the right thing".
Try to increase transparency and consistency of the review system and reduce process.
Behavioral and based on cultural fit. Questions revolved around: * Your ability to cope with failure. * Your ability to learn from mistakes. * Your ability to grow as a technical expert and as a leader and manager.
The phone screen was followed relatively quickly by an onsite interview. Everyone was very nice, professional, and courteous, except for one "breadth" interviewer from an outside team. I rated the interview negatively because the recruiter was a no-s
I applied at a career fair and online. Like in most blogs, my interview was pretty standard. Firstly, I had an on-campus interview where I was asked about my resume and a technical question. I was contacted later and told that I got to go to Redmond
Behavioral and based on cultural fit. Questions revolved around: * Your ability to cope with failure. * Your ability to learn from mistakes. * Your ability to grow as a technical expert and as a leader and manager.
The phone screen was followed relatively quickly by an onsite interview. Everyone was very nice, professional, and courteous, except for one "breadth" interviewer from an outside team. I rated the interview negatively because the recruiter was a no-s
I applied at a career fair and online. Like in most blogs, my interview was pretty standard. Firstly, I had an on-campus interview where I was asked about my resume and a technical question. I was contacted later and told that I got to go to Redmond