Company stability, education and certification support, and a relatively good work/life balance in mature teams.
Terrible managers around (not all, but a higher index of really bad managers than any other place before), slow growth for experienced industry hires.
Eliminate the ranking system. Use a competency-based performance evaluation that doesn't assume 10% of bad performers. Instead of improving the company, it creates the trend for 50% to focus on politics and "perform well," while creating +30% underperformers.
I was very impressed with the efficiency of the hiring process. After submitting my resume on Microsoft.com/jobs, I did not hear from the team I applied to. But within a week, I was contacted by a different team about a job that was a better fit. T
HR will arrange the whole process. It really depends on the team. But mostly, multiple people will interview you, and there will be a senior person at the end to decide whether to make an offer. For an SDET leader, they mostly look for leadership a
Very straightforward, two back-to-back thirty-minute technical interviews that had a combination of LeetCode easy and medium questions, along with some behavioral questions that were sprinkled in there.
I was very impressed with the efficiency of the hiring process. After submitting my resume on Microsoft.com/jobs, I did not hear from the team I applied to. But within a week, I was contacted by a different team about a job that was a better fit. T
HR will arrange the whole process. It really depends on the team. But mostly, multiple people will interview you, and there will be a senior person at the end to decide whether to make an offer. For an SDET leader, they mostly look for leadership a
Very straightforward, two back-to-back thirty-minute technical interviews that had a combination of LeetCode easy and medium questions, along with some behavioral questions that were sprinkled in there.