Good salary and perks. Nice offices. Work with challenging and important technology. Work with very smart people.
The company is very paternalistic. I haven't felt that ordered around since high school. The harsh review cycle encourages bad behavior by employees. Internal politics are quite brutal. People helping each other without some ulterior motive is rare. Not recommended if you are a mid- to late-career person. The above noted pro - lots of smart people - leads to a lot of arrogance and hubris. People are always very serious.
You guys need to lighten up. The review system needs to be changed to allow employees to focus on the products and customers instead of playing Machiavellian games to get promoted.
Phone call - reviewing my CV 1st one-on-one meeting was scheduled. A few days later, it was 1.5 hours long. In the meeting, I was asked to detail the architecture of a project I was working on, plus all kinds of questions about it (e.g., "How did yo
The process was quick and dynamic, but you had to study hard. The people were great and very supportive. It seems like a great place to work for. Compensation was lower than expected. There was remote and flexible work.
After several months of silence following my application, I was informed that I had been selected for final interviews. I underwent two interviews, conducted back-to-back. One interview was in Spanish, and the other was in English. Both interviews
Phone call - reviewing my CV 1st one-on-one meeting was scheduled. A few days later, it was 1.5 hours long. In the meeting, I was asked to detail the architecture of a project I was working on, plus all kinds of questions about it (e.g., "How did yo
The process was quick and dynamic, but you had to study hard. The people were great and very supportive. It seems like a great place to work for. Compensation was lower than expected. There was remote and flexible work.
After several months of silence following my application, I was informed that I had been selected for final interviews. I underwent two interviews, conducted back-to-back. One interview was in Spanish, and the other was in English. Both interviews