Technically very inspiring.
Great focus on individual contributors.
Great professionalism in keeping solutions simple.
Great principle of ship it fast, improve it fast.
Disrespectful treatment of employees as an expense.
Massive dishonesty and hypocrisy in the review process.
Use the review solely as a base for bonuses, but do not block people from switching positions when their manager takes a dislike to them.
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 3 months. Interview Process - Coding Assessment: An initial technical coding challenge to evaluate problem-solving skills, algorithmic thinking, and code quality. - Recruiting Coordinator Call: A disc
Phone screen: Design Questions 1st Interview: OOPs 2nd Interview: Binary Tree and Palindrome 3rd Interview: String traversal 4th Interview (Hiring Manager): Meeting booking Topics: * Design an elevator * OOPs concepts with an example * Data Stru
I submitted my resume at a career fair. I was subsequently invited to an on-campus interview with a recruiter who had previously worked as a PM. The interview was non-technical; he only asked about my previous work and which of the three internship t
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 3 months. Interview Process - Coding Assessment: An initial technical coding challenge to evaluate problem-solving skills, algorithmic thinking, and code quality. - Recruiting Coordinator Call: A disc
Phone screen: Design Questions 1st Interview: OOPs 2nd Interview: Binary Tree and Palindrome 3rd Interview: String traversal 4th Interview (Hiring Manager): Meeting booking Topics: * Design an elevator * OOPs concepts with an example * Data Stru
I submitted my resume at a career fair. I was subsequently invited to an on-campus interview with a recruiter who had previously worked as a PM. The interview was non-technical; he only asked about my previous work and which of the three internship t