Highly subjective review system
Make the review system more flexible and allow people to switch teams even if their review is bad. Also, get more technologists in SVP positions.
Three interviews, including one general interview. All three interviews, even the one at the GM level, were technical, involving algorithms and writing code on a whiteboard. They included optimization questions, testing possibilities, etc.
The interview process is somewhat unpredictable. There are multiple interviews, typically between three and five. The interviews themselves have somewhat unpredictable content. Some teams leave it up to the individual interviewer to determine what
There were 3 rounds of technical interviews after the initial screening. Different interviewers asked some repeated questions. Some questions focused on your existing areas of expertise, including: * Active Directory * .NET * CI/CD
Three interviews, including one general interview. All three interviews, even the one at the GM level, were technical, involving algorithms and writing code on a whiteboard. They included optimization questions, testing possibilities, etc.
The interview process is somewhat unpredictable. There are multiple interviews, typically between three and five. The interviews themselves have somewhat unpredictable content. Some teams leave it up to the individual interviewer to determine what
There were 3 rounds of technical interviews after the initial screening. Different interviewers asked some repeated questions. Some questions focused on your existing areas of expertise, including: * Active Directory * .NET * CI/CD