Great benefits, smart people to work with.
Too many meetings. Still using waterfall methodology for software development. Terrible review systems.
Change review system, cut down on meetings.
They wanted a Tech PM to do full-time development without any analysis of the business flow or workflow. They basically wanted laborers who could write code for them without even understanding why they were writing it. I went through a loop of six ro
Overall, the interview process is professional. It started with a phone screen, then I flew to Redmond for an on-site interview. The team was quite interested in my past projects and asked for a lot of details. The coding questions were not very har
Pretty typical of what else is on here, but with a different twist. I met with three engineers and then the final interviewer, which they called the "as appropriate." Other questions were around linked list traversal and working with arrays and index
They wanted a Tech PM to do full-time development without any analysis of the business flow or workflow. They basically wanted laborers who could write code for them without even understanding why they were writing it. I went through a loop of six ro
Overall, the interview process is professional. It started with a phone screen, then I flew to Redmond for an on-site interview. The team was quite interested in my past projects and asked for a lot of details. The coding questions were not very har
Pretty typical of what else is on here, but with a different twist. I met with three engineers and then the final interviewer, which they called the "as appropriate." Other questions were around linked list traversal and working with arrays and index