You must find opportunities to learn from others, and you have the most impact to drive your own career. Nothing comes to you automatically. This is a place where people who take initiative can thrive. People around you are very smart and ambitious. Employees can learn a lot from the right mentor.
Your experience, performance, and opportunities are heavily determined by your direct manager's support and, indirectly, your skip-level manager. Regardless of whether you do good work or bad, the process is highly political. If you have a bad relationship with your manager, even if it isn't "your fault," you're set up for failure. It is, unfortunately, a prerequisite that you manage this relationship first before your actual work performance, because little else matters if your manager does not go up to bat for you.
For me, I was lucky to have supportive direct managers. For many of my peers, however, I've seen very poor managers, and there is little the system can do to protect employees from bad managers. It's a crap shoot at times.
Too many managers at Microsoft. It seems like everyone is a manager-of-people, even when they have 0-2 direct reports. This results in too much hierarchy and too many management layers. Senior managers need to pay more attention to WHI numbers and feedback. There needs to be a better vetting process for managers.
Smooth and simple. Everyone was very polite, and HR was easy to communicate with. I'd do it all over again in a heartbeat. On-site also went decently well (although I've heard horror stories from others). Interviewees had plenty of perks to help th
1 telephonic interview, followed by 4 onsite technical interviews.
The interview process includes: * An on-campus pre-screen. * A loop of 3-4 in-office interviews. * An "as appropriate" interview with a more senior manager. Each interview seemed to have a slightly different objective while also white-boardin
Smooth and simple. Everyone was very polite, and HR was easy to communicate with. I'd do it all over again in a heartbeat. On-site also went decently well (although I've heard horror stories from others). Interviewees had plenty of perks to help th
1 telephonic interview, followed by 4 onsite technical interviews.
The interview process includes: * An on-campus pre-screen. * A loop of 3-4 in-office interviews. * An "as appropriate" interview with a more senior manager. Each interview seemed to have a slightly different objective while also white-boardin