Extremely disorganized. They have a five-interview process that I went through entirely only to be rejected over my level of experience, which is something we discussed in interview one. My experience was also well within the job posting.
Why put me through a peer review, code of ethics interview, and a one-hour presentation (that I spent 10 hours making) if the answer was no from the start?
They didn't even contact me to tell me. I did the fifth interview and heard no feedback for two weeks until I contacted them myself to check in. They said they had already hired someone else.
"I've been meaning to call you, I've just been so busy." Then they had the nerve to say that they might consider me for a junior role.
Also, the job posting was incorrect. It was not for a Solution Architect role that would be working with the actual products; it was for a services role. This came up later in the process, but I was willing to roll with it.
The position is now filled, but the job posting is still active, so they are receiving applications that are going nowhere.
Once again, extremely disorganized. One of their core values is "Scrappy," which makes sense because they seem to be scraping through every interaction and hoping for the best. Also, the CEO freaks me out.
I did 4 hours of interviews. I can't list all the questions. 99% of questions were behavioral. So, how would you act in this specific scenario?
The following metrics were computed from 2 interview experiences for the Qualtrics Solutions Architect role in Australia.
Qualtrics's interview process for their Solutions Architect roles in Australia is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Qualtrics's Solutions Architect interview process in Australia.