Unfortunately, I found the interview process outdated and unnecessarily rigid.

The live coding session required me to disable all Copilots and restricted me from performing any Google searches. This lack of flexibility felt unrealistic, as it does not reflect the way modern developers work. Additionally, I was asked to implement a feature using Views/XML, which is considered obsolete by today's standards, where Jetpack Compose is the preferred approach for modern Android development.

Furthermore, a significant portion of the interview was focused on theoretical questions about concurrency and synchronization, without paying attention to practical problem-solving or my thought process. Finally, during the last five minutes, I was asked to write a test, and they even scrutinized the name I chose for the test—an approach that felt overly meticulous and disconnected from actual development priorities.

Overall, the interview model felt archaic, seemingly designed for a decade-old landscape rather than the current state of Android development. The emphasis on outdated technologies and theoretical questioning, rather than practical problem-solving and creativity, makes me question whether this approach is suited to evaluating modern Android engineers.

Implement a feature using Views/XML.

Explain various concepts related to concurrency and synchronization.