Pros: - The kitchen is stocked. - Lunch is provided.

Cons: Managers' intention is not to grow employees. Lots of politics, and if you can play that well, this place won't be suffocating. Micro-management. Funnily, when I left, I spoke to HR and told them the reason I was leaving was my manager. The response I got was, "You are the 3rd person leaving for the same reason." They don't do anything to change the culture of the place. But when they are interviewing you, they provide an amazing picture of the company and culture, which is not true. Would not recommend this place to anyone.

Pros: - Some people are very helpful and collaborative. - Benefits have expanded. - Compensation is competitive. - Stock has done very well.

Cons: - Above-average level of politics (favoritism, obstruction, showmanship, pandering) within management. - Managers don't grow employees; they are just a pass-through for blame and responsibility. - Managers and ICs have little power to make decisions; decisions are made from the VP/exec level with little transparency. - Some with long tenure refuse to go to meetings, refuse to answer questions, and stall work from being done. - Exec leadership is a very closed group that is an echo chamber for the CEO. - Products are figure-it-out-yourself with no specs or documentation. - Competitiveness between teams means others are blocked from making progress on their own deliverables. - Innovation is choked due to continuous disagreement on a path forward. - Some code has no owners and requires you to reverse engineer the code to learn its function. - Weird model where if the owning team doesn't have time to work on something, engineers must make the changes themselves in code they don't know and own that piece going forward. - Some teams hire exclusively from FAANG companies. - Performance reviews are just a single number without much substantiation. - "Can I have a beer with this person?" was a question used by managers to decide on candidates. - VP review of interview candidates caused numerous candidates with all "yes" feedback to be thrown out. - They talk about diversity then continue to hire non-diverse senior and executive leadership. - Leadership doubled down on return to office then, at the last second, turned around due to internal protest.

Pros: Great pay, culture, and interesting work.

Cons: The CEO is very against remote work.