The company has good policies and a decent work culture. Learning and career opportunities depend on the project that you are placed in.
The compensation benefits are not based on performance over the year. Your learning opportunities depend on the project you are placed on. There is very little scope for personal growth.
Remove competency exams and check for actual performers on the project and their contributions made for the product delivery. The compensation and ratings are unfair and unjust and it solely depends the kind of college you qualified from.
I applied through a common site like LinkedIn. HR contacted me and informed me about the job requirements. Two rounds of face-to-face interviews then happened. Each interview went for one and a half hours. They asked basic questions and project-r
It was a good technical discussion, and the interviewer was very open. After that, I had one HR round. I asked a bit less. He agreed at one shot. The CTC offered was split into a bonus.
The hiring process was quite drawn out. It included a phone interview and a take-home test. This was followed by a 1:1 interview. The offer was given two weeks later.
I applied through a common site like LinkedIn. HR contacted me and informed me about the job requirements. Two rounds of face-to-face interviews then happened. Each interview went for one and a half hours. They asked basic questions and project-r
It was a good technical discussion, and the interviewer was very open. After that, I had one HR round. I asked a bit less. He agreed at one shot. The CTC offered was split into a bonus.
The hiring process was quite drawn out. It included a phone interview and a take-home test. This was followed by a 1:1 interview. The offer was given two weeks later.