Great people, smart, everyone is approaching and welcoming. At the individual contributor level, there is less politics, and depending on the team, things are very challenging in a fun way. You'll never get bored (also depending on the team).
Leadership can push hard for features and not prioritize building for the long term, while putting dev health in jeopardy (overworking on deadlines). But I guess that’s kind of normal. What do you expect different from a SaaS company?
Less deadlines, more long-term building.
The interview process was very standard, with the exception of the "Life story" interview. - Recruiter screen - "Life story" interview with recruiter - Technical screen - On-site interview (2 technical, 1 project, 1 system design)
This process started fine and ended in a very confusing and disappointing way. I submitted an application online and was contacted by a recruiter the next morning. I was asked to participate in a 75-minute pair programming exercise, as well as to fil
I was contacted by a recruiter via email, who then set me up for both a technical screen and an aptitude test. The aptitude test was similar to IQ tests. The technical screen was a pretty basic "you drive while we pair program a problem." The techn
The interview process was very standard, with the exception of the "Life story" interview. - Recruiter screen - "Life story" interview with recruiter - Technical screen - On-site interview (2 technical, 1 project, 1 system design)
This process started fine and ended in a very confusing and disappointing way. I submitted an application online and was contacted by a recruiter the next morning. I was asked to participate in a 75-minute pair programming exercise, as well as to fil
I was contacted by a recruiter via email, who then set me up for both a technical screen and an aptitude test. The aptitude test was similar to IQ tests. The technical screen was a pretty basic "you drive while we pair program a problem." The techn