Software Development Engineer in Test (SDET) Interview Experience
Process
I applied online.
I read the company reviews, and there were quite a few negative ones. But I decided to give the company a shot because who knows if the reviews could be skewed. My thoughts have been solidified. The recruiter reached out to set up an interview. I got the initial interview scheduled, which they proceeded to reschedule. A confirmation was sent the day before the rescheduled interview was supposed to occur. On the day of, they ghosted. So much of my time was wasted. It was very unprofessional.
Was this helpful?
Interview Statistics
The following metrics were computed from 2 interview experiences for the Spring Health Software Development Engineer in Test (SDET) role.
Success Rate
Spring Health's interview process for their Software Development Engineer in Test (SDET) roles is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Experience Rating
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Spring Health's Software Development Engineer in Test (SDET) interview process.
Spring Health Work Experiences
- 5.0fast growing and pretty transparentSoftware Engineer • Former EmployeeNew York, NYFebruary 16, 2020Pros: Spring Health was a good place to work overall. The company is growing really fast which means there are lots of opportunities to take on more responsibilities or run with things. The people are smart and genuinely care about mental health.Cons: Things are pretty hectic and people are expected to figure things out without much help.
- 2.0Meaningful mission and work, but pressure and mistrust persist from the topDirector of Engineering • Current EmployeeNew York, NYMay 31, 2026Pros: Mission, people on the ground, the actual work.Cons: There was undue pressure, executive mistrust out of the gate for anyone in engineering, and a severe lack of empowerment.
- 2.0Good pay and flexibility, but toxic culture prevailsSenior Software Engineer • Former EmployeeNew York, NYSeptember 25, 2026Pros: The pay is good and competitive. A flexible remote culture.Cons: They burn you out at all cost and seldom provide help. The culture is very toxic and you have to play politics to get ahead. Mediocre people who learned how to play it get promoted quite quickly. A revolving door of senior technical leadership doesn't strike any confidence.
