Everyone's superficially very nice and empathetic, most genuinely so. Good pay, and great benefits, especially if you have kids. Interesting technical problems. Great vision and solid product execution.
Upper management seems pretty good at managing the business side of things, but horrible at managing employees/talent.
Encourage more long-term technical thinking.
How you measure performance directly impacts employee incentives. What are your performance metrics incentivizing?
Not one of my interviewers had been at Stripe for more than a year. I heard more about what it was like to work at Microsoft from them than I did about Stripe. I turned down the offer and went to another big tech company, primarily because of how bad
Pros: * Streamlined scheduling for recruiter and technical interviews. * Screening for multiple locations and teams. Cons: * One hour technical interview was supposed to be 45 minutes for coding, but since the question involved multiple parts (up
Recruiter screen + DSA interview. Passed their DSA question, still got rejected. Asked for feedback and was ghosted. Not sure what they were looking for, but some feedback is the minimum they could provide, given that candidates spent a couple of h
Not one of my interviewers had been at Stripe for more than a year. I heard more about what it was like to work at Microsoft from them than I did about Stripe. I turned down the offer and went to another big tech company, primarily because of how bad
Pros: * Streamlined scheduling for recruiter and technical interviews. * Screening for multiple locations and teams. Cons: * One hour technical interview was supposed to be 45 minutes for coding, but since the question involved multiple parts (up
Recruiter screen + DSA interview. Passed their DSA question, still got rejected. Asked for feedback and was ghosted. Not sure what they were looking for, but some feedback is the minimum they could provide, given that candidates spent a couple of h