I work at ATG, so the environment may be different than at other sites. I have a diverse team with a profile of experiences prior to Uber. I learn new things from my coworkers every day. I have a great immediate team and a good boss.
Most of the people that work here are invested in the company's success. The market for self-driving vehicles is incredibly competitive, and we want Uber to win.
I am a woman engineer, and I have had an incredibly positive experience thus far. I think the company is committed to making Uber a better place to work for women and other underrepresented groups.
ATG will ignore important Uber initiatives by saying, "We aren't a part of ride-sharing; this doesn't apply to us." That can be frustrating, especially when a program, training, or experience becomes available to Prime and you feel it is important.
Uber ATG is a part of Uber, so please treat it as such.
Hire more women. Hire more minorities.
And stop using the excuse of "There aren't any qualified women (or other group)". Having an all-male team is a reflection on your hiring practices, not the pool of candidates.
I was contacted by a recruiter. My interview process involved: * A phone interview. * A homework round, for which I was given a week. * Five personal interviews onsite, four of which were technical. * The final interview was with the hiring
Tough but fair. I thought it could have been more involved, but they seemed to have their ideal candidate in mind before the interview began. I would interview again for an engineering role.
The team is low-speed and low-efficiency. I had my first phone interview two months ago and only heard back about the onsite about two weeks ago. The interview process was just okay, but they seemed to only have one acceptable answer, without conside
I was contacted by a recruiter. My interview process involved: * A phone interview. * A homework round, for which I was given a week. * Five personal interviews onsite, four of which were technical. * The final interview was with the hiring
Tough but fair. I thought it could have been more involved, but they seemed to have their ideal candidate in mind before the interview began. I would interview again for an engineering role.
The team is low-speed and low-efficiency. I had my first phone interview two months ago and only heard back about the onsite about two weeks ago. The interview process was just okay, but they seemed to only have one acceptable answer, without conside