None. Tons of inexperienced managers.
Managers are incapable of understanding the problems you explain and are also good with their silly stories, which only wastes your time. They always play the favoritism game.
There is only a blame game here; no one wants to improve their own part.
Let us review our managers and provide feedback.
Have some sort of goal-setting process. Till now, all appraisals are just face value.
The overall interview process was fairly standard. It began with an HR round that lasted around 15–20 minutes, followed by three technical rounds. I believe I performed well throughout, and I was informed afterward that the feedback from the technic
There were 3 rounds in total. * 2 rounds of coding/system design with Principal Engineers. They also discussed one project in detail. * 1 hiring manager round, where previous projects were discussed.
I received a rejection email for my domain expertise role. The recruiter reached out on the same day for two other roles. Round 1: Technical round. Questions covered past project architecture and challenges, along with a LeetCode problem. Round 2:
The overall interview process was fairly standard. It began with an HR round that lasted around 15–20 minutes, followed by three technical rounds. I believe I performed well throughout, and I was informed afterward that the feedback from the technic
There were 3 rounds in total. * 2 rounds of coding/system design with Principal Engineers. They also discussed one project in detail. * 1 hiring manager round, where previous projects were discussed.
I received a rejection email for my domain expertise role. The recruiter reached out on the same day for two other roles. Round 1: Technical round. Questions covered past project architecture and challenges, along with a LeetCode problem. Round 2: