If I’m interviewing for an L4 position at FAANG+, I understand that the system design expectations aren’t as high as they would be for more senior roles.
Should I treat the system design interview somewhat like a behavioral round, focusing on skills like breaking down complex tasks, asking clarifying questions, addressing ambiguity, being open to feedback, and showing vulnerability—essentially, qualities expected at a Junior to Mid level?
If I don’t know the specific answers to questions about scaling or other advanced technical topics, would it be fair to approach the system design round as a way to show how I’d collaborate and operate on the team?
My main concern is that if I take this approach, the interviewer might still expect deeper technical knowledge and tell me, “You should already know this and have experience with it.” I am looking to avoid this surprise.
Any insights would be deeply appreciated.
I wouldn't treat a System Design round as a behavioral interview for two reasons:
The system design bar isn't that high for L4, but it is there. You should have some basic instincts about what's scalable and what's not - A classic example is knowing the differences between a polling solution and a listening solution like a web socket.
The system design interview is sort of like a behavioral interview in that it's very open-ended and more about the quality of the conversation, but it is distinctly different. It's still a very technical exercise despite you not having to write any code.
I recommend the other system design course we have as well: The Top Ways People Fail System Design Interviews