I struggle sometimes to understand leadership's points or questions. If I interpret it as-is, the answer is too detailed or in-depth for their purpose. If I poke some more, with some back and forth, I may get the question; but when I look around for other more senior eng, they don't seem to have this issue. I was told I need to uplevel my thoughts. Not sure how I go about that, anyone have been through this?
There are no comments on this discussion yet.
Give it an upvote, and you'll be notified when the community chimes in!