We have great opportunities for development and learning more, with a great community and many good leaders.
Each project has its peculiarities. Some are great in terms of maturity, opportunities, and development. Others are not. Moving from a mature project to one that isn't is a cold shower. Another negative point is career progression. Your promotion also depends on the client's approval. Your performance on the project or your internal performance is not enough; if the client is not willing to pay more for your promotion, IBM will not promote you.
There was no technical interview. They just asked general questions about oneself and hired all eligible students. They hired all students regardless of their knowledge. If that is the case, why do they hire GH and then remove them for cost-cutting
The interview process includes: * Skills interview with HR * Internal technical interview with IBM personnel * Client technical interview The process is relatively straightforward, provided you have experience with the technology stack.
You should be well prepared in every domain you have mentioned on your resume, as the interview will be based on it. Try to communicate fluently what you know about the questions asked.
There was no technical interview. They just asked general questions about oneself and hired all eligible students. They hired all students regardless of their knowledge. If that is the case, why do they hire GH and then remove them for cost-cutting
The interview process includes: * Skills interview with HR * Internal technical interview with IBM personnel * Client technical interview The process is relatively straightforward, provided you have experience with the technology stack.
You should be well prepared in every domain you have mentioned on your resume, as the interview will be based on it. Try to communicate fluently what you know about the questions asked.