The location where I was working was predominantly engineers, so the atmosphere was fairly relaxed and technical. Everyone was relatively laid-back.
The way their process worked at the time could lead to dev and UI people butting heads. Engineers would wander off and make UI decisions all week, then get pixel-specific feedback periodically in meetings. It seemed like a backwards way to do things.
Separate the UI and implementation more. People who actually know what's needed could have changed this by now for all I know, or maybe interns were just in a weird spot.
I met with a recruiter at the Spring Engineering Career Fair at the University of Iowa. He took my resume, and we talked a little. Shortly afterward, I received an e-mail from IBM asking to set up a phone interview. A couple of hours after the phone
I was asked a lot of technical questions, and also about my work ethic and learning capability. The interviewer was very friendly and understanding. It was all relevant to my job, and I was very comfortable.
The interview happens in three rounds. The first round is a technical interview, the second round is a managerial interview, and the third round is an HR interview. Overall, the interview process is good.
I met with a recruiter at the Spring Engineering Career Fair at the University of Iowa. He took my resume, and we talked a little. Shortly afterward, I received an e-mail from IBM asking to set up a phone interview. A couple of hours after the phone
I was asked a lot of technical questions, and also about my work ethic and learning capability. The interviewer was very friendly and understanding. It was all relevant to my job, and I was very comfortable.
The interview happens in three rounds. The first round is a technical interview, the second round is a managerial interview, and the third round is an HR interview. Overall, the interview process is good.