Sr. Software Quality Assurance Engineer Interview Experience
Process
This seems like a trend amongst recruiters at Irythm.
I had applied for a role, and about a week later, I was emailed to schedule an introductory interview. Within 15 minutes of receiving that email, I successfully submitted my availability for the entire next week, as requested. However, I never received a confirmation email with a selected date and time.
I then emailed the recruiter directly to confirm, but received no response that same day. The next day, I emailed the recruiter again, still with no response. Five days later, I emailed that same recruiter a third time, and still have yet to receive a response.
This ghosting is completely unacceptable and quite unprofessional. The recruiting process needs to be reassessed immediately.
Was this helpful?
Interview Statistics
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the IRhythm Sr. Software Quality Assurance Engineer role in United States.
Success Rate
IRhythm's interview process for their Sr. Software Quality Assurance Engineer roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Experience Rating
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for IRhythm's Sr. Software Quality Assurance Engineer interview process in United States.
IRhythm Work Experiences
- 1.0Horrible ManagementEngineer • Current EmployeeCypress, CAFebruary 25, 2024Pros: Good benefits and a good salary.Cons: I believe that iRhythm has a lot of potential as a company regardless of the multiple lawsuits they are facing. However, I feel that the company is falling apart because of the lack of leadership. The last earnings call was a little bit disappointing considering that they mentioned around seven times a solution that may not fix the real issues that the company is having, and when you actually see how management is trying to execute the action plan, it is more concerning. Also, it is very sad seeing how the same management told employees that we are on a very tight budget and they are trying to save 100 bucks for equipment that is needed for business continuation or personal development, but at the same time they can have fancy dinners of thousands of dollars. Adding to this, ethics violation complaints are not taken seriously. We got warning letters and multiple 483 observations, and nothing happened within our quality department. Instead, they promoted people and started to push more changes that make no sense and that can actually affect the business more than before. iRhythm may thrive and succeed at the end of all this madness, but it will stay with a toxic environment with unhappy staff who will do things just for money with no motivation.
- 1.0No longer a good company to work forMachine Learning Scientist • Former EmployeeSan Francisco, CANovember 12, 2024Pros: Good work-life balance; talented people.Cons: Very poor upper management. Outlook is not good also. Questionable business model.
- 2.0Management StSr. Data Platform Engineer • Former EmployeeSan Francisco, CAMarch 7, 2024Pros: Not too many. Stock is also fluctuating and there is some arrogance in the upper management.Cons: Not too many in the last couple of years. Firing people left and right for the wrong reasons, which lowered the morale.
