Great experience overall, no micromanaging and lots of learning.
Current changes to the company
The interview process involved: * One initial interview with HR. * Four subsequent interviews, two of which were technical, focusing on programming and problem-solving with coding challenges. * The remaining interviews concentrated on testing.
The selection criteria were confused, and the feedback was also unclear. Nothing specific was provided. In the end, I learned that many employees were laid off, and I was never informed about it.
The process is long. It consists of more or less five interviews: * A typical algorithms one (twice) * An architecture one * A simple program one * One where they ask you about your experience (they might be too lazy to read it from your CV). After
The interview process involved: * One initial interview with HR. * Four subsequent interviews, two of which were technical, focusing on programming and problem-solving with coding challenges. * The remaining interviews concentrated on testing.
The selection criteria were confused, and the feedback was also unclear. Nothing specific was provided. In the end, I learned that many employees were laid off, and I was never informed about it.
The process is long. It consists of more or less five interviews: * A typical algorithms one (twice) * An architecture one * A simple program one * One where they ask you about your experience (they might be too lazy to read it from your CV). After