Pros: Great salary, benefits, people, etc.

Cons: The work can feel meaningless.

Pros: A lot of work to be done, meaning you have flexibility on what to work and there are ample opportunities to do something awesome. Perks are amazing, but they are made so you don't stress with the little details of life. I work fewer hours on average than my previous top-company job but achieve a lot more in that time. No micromanagement overall (obviously there are black sheep everywhere). You do need to know how to prioritize and work by yourself without being pushed, though. Mission and vision that matter to the world. "Don't be evil," eh? Right. Here, we're truly connecting the world. Very few teams focus on revenue, which is awesome. Excellent compensation. Do I need to say more? Travel to HQ if you're a remote team. It's not so often, so I enjoy it (a personal thing, though).

Cons: The other "G" giant has a few more extra perks that are nicer, but you can live without them. Growing very fast. Hoping quality does not deteriorate, but things can get messy.

Pros: High salary + RSU Sometimes interesting projects Bottom-up culture

Cons: Every 1:1 with my manager is talking about PSC (the performance cycle) and how to optimize it. Very little time is actually spent talking about how to improve the product we work on. Inconsistent and poor leadership—changes to how things are run constantly, based on seemingly nothing. As of November, we seem to lose at least 1-2 perks a week. Little to no mentorship. Bottom-up culture forces ICs to come up with projects.