Move fast culture's side effects, combined with short evaluation cycles, are: not much strategy and short-to-finish projects. This can be good and bad for engineers, but it's certainly not ideal for a company.
The bottom-up decision-making process can result in waste of resources, as engineers don't always know or understand the company's best interests.
There are lots of indirect competitions, as everybody tries to produce impact.
Longer term strategies and certainly less reorgs
The interview process itself was quite pleasant. The interviewers were very good, demonstrating friendliness and openness throughout. The entire process remained highly professional. Unfortunately, midway through the process, the company experience
The process was very straightforward. Not easy, but it fit when well prepared. Interviewers were always very nice, polite, and professional. The whole process was smooth and moved at a good pace. Interviewing at Meta is taken to a high standard.
A recruiter reached out and briefly went over the role and my resume to ensure it was a fit. The interview process involved: * First round phone interviews (1 coding, 1 systems) * Second round "virtual onsite" (1 coding, 1 behavioral, 1 systems
The interview process itself was quite pleasant. The interviewers were very good, demonstrating friendliness and openness throughout. The entire process remained highly professional. Unfortunately, midway through the process, the company experience
The process was very straightforward. Not easy, but it fit when well prepared. Interviewers were always very nice, polite, and professional. The whole process was smooth and moved at a good pace. Interviewing at Meta is taken to a high standard.
A recruiter reached out and briefly went over the role and my resume to ensure it was a fit. The interview process involved: * First round phone interviews (1 coding, 1 systems) * Second round "virtual onsite" (1 coding, 1 behavioral, 1 systems