Taro Logo

Spent a third of my life working there. Enjoyed the first ten years

Engineering Manager
Former Employee
Worked at Microsoft for 20 years
March 6, 2014
Mountain View, California
3.0
Doesn't RecommendNeutral OutlookApproves of CEO
Pros

When I started there, it was a company full of wickedly smart people who all worked tirelessly, and sometimes in isolation, to move the company forward.

It was always a meritocracy, and I was okay with that, as you got to work on cutting-edge technologies.

The career development there was stellar, and I was presented with multiple international opportunities that allowed me to make my home in the USA, with stints in Europe and Asia to round out my experience.

Cons

Over the last few years, the changes to the review model killed collaboration. You became locked in step in battle with your peers, fighting for a review score that you could apply a dollar amount to. I understand that has gone now, and that is the only reason why I give it three stars now, as there is a chance that the changes will fix this.

The company has too much middle management, and a lot of it is mediocre. Sadly, I became one of those mediocre middle managers because I could not connect the work that my 80+ person team was doing with the success of the company, and my game face wasn't good enough to help motivate my team. So I got out and haven't looked back since. I just learned my team is about to get cut by 75% as they are being 'merged' with another one.

Advice to Management

With the new CEO at the helm, there is a big opportunity for change. He needs to eliminate as much of the tired, hapless middle management as possible and restructure the company so teams are rewarded for their progress and failing teams are penalized appropriately. Keep it a meritocracy, but reward the high-performing teams, not individuals.

Was this helpful?

Microsoft Interview Experiences