The interview process began with a first-round screening with an internal recruiter, followed by a second-round videoconference screening with a team member.
Next, an 8-hour on-site interview took place with 6+ individuals from the department with the open position.
The on-site could have been shorter, perhaps just 2-3 hours, as it quickly became apparent that there wasn't a culture fit. Only 2-3 technical questions were asked during the entire process, and none of them related to my background or the role.
I had the distinct impression that staffers spend a lot of time putting out fires. Interestingly, they appear to have a very formulaic hiring process, but no clear standards for managing people. When I asked how my performance would be measured, I didn't really receive an answer. This doesn't appear to be an ideal place for metrics- or performance-driven individuals, which I find surprising given their mission.
Design a database system with specific transaction-handling features and data storage requirements.
(I had to sign an NDA to enter the building, and based on my review of it, this is the most I think I can say.)
In your career, what achievement were you most proud of?
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Uber Engineering Manager role in Louisville, Colorado.
Uber's interview process for their Engineering Manager roles in Louisville, Colorado is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Uber's Engineering Manager interview process in Louisville, Colorado.