Do four things:

1. Learn to use [Search Techniques](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHQiJ3kq52M). It sounds like a simple two-word phrase, but undervaluing this is single biggest mistake you can make in trying to becoming a high-productivity engineer. All software, all architecture, all social skill, all knowledge acquisition is downstream of searching techniques.
2. Learn to use your tools. Start with your IDE and multiple AI assistants. Use GPT-4. Use Copilot. Add Prettier in VS Code and the other extensions to make sure you have linting, formatting, syntax highlighting, version control support, and support for containers or whatever things your team is using.
3. Learn time management and social techniques. Three specifically:
   1. Calendar Blocking. Our code jitsu works best when single tasking. Multitasking is a productivity killer. Block your calender.
   2. Timeboxing and Escalation Procedure. You say "My goal is to become extremely efficient at coding. I want to build a reputation as someone who is able to deliver tons of high-quality implementation and products very quickly." You need to realize the first sentence isn't the key to the second sentence. You need to learn how to escalate quickly and to the right people when you hit a wall. This is going to include soft skills. You need to be able to communicate well to motivate others to help you and so they can understand how to optimally help you once they are motivated.
4. Practice, practice, practice.

Senior Software Engineer at Upstart

John Vandivier

My top-line recommendation is that you should accept this offer, but read on for some nuances and caveats.

Here are the four main reasons I think you should accept this offer, in no particular order:

1. If your main concern is employability, I can tell you as someone with a Ph.D. in economics with a focus on employer perception: It's difficult to find a better signal to future tech employers than having experience at both Microsoft and Meta. This decision is likely to pay dividends as a signal through the rest of your career.
2. This decision is also likely to pay in the immediate future. If you are going to Meta L+1 from Microsoft you should be earning more. If the comp is lower than your current comp, you should be able to easily negotiate that up.
3. If you applied to Meta then you already have some intrinsic interest in that company and/or in leaving Microsoft.
4. If you are in tech with a true passion for tech itself, you will be able to learn interesting things by going to Meta that you would not learn by remaining at Microsoft in perpetuity. Given that you will eventually go somewhere else for the sake of tech exposure, Meta is one of the best places to go.

#### The Soft Skill Gap as a False Difference

I also want to discourage you from choosing to work at Meta for the purpose of soft skill development. You called out a WFH comfort zone, and while I'm sure you in fact have such a comfort zone, I want to emphatically discourage you from using this in a cost-benefit analysis of Microsoft vs Meta. I emphatically disagree that remote work is causing your soft skill gap. There are other ways to develop that skill group even while fully remote.

#### Caveats and Nuances

1. If you have offers from other Big Tech companies, then you may not want to choose Meta. The main reasons 2 and 3 would be deflated in this case, and you could use Meta's offer to negotiate a better offer elsewhere. Example: If you received an offer from Google.
2. If you do not have a genuine interest in technology itself, then going to Meta will be a bit less interesting. Maybe you are fine spending a whole career at Microsoft. There's nothing wrong with this, it just depends on your personality and goals.
3. If you can use the L+1 offer to obtain promo and better comp at Microsoft, then the incentive to leave will be reduced. Strongly consider main reason 3 to determine whether this consideration is decisive: Why are you wanting to leave Microsoft? If you can cross all of the reasons off of your list, then maybe you shouldn't leave after all. In general, when people write such a list they won't be able to cross everything off. In general, when people get an external offer that is countered by their current employer, even if they accept the counteroffer they will leave within 2 years.

Hey Alex! I recommend these:

https://www.ladderly.io/blog/2023-12-01-top-job-boards

> Engage with the Community...Check if the project has a community platform like Discord or Slack

This is one of two keys. "Discord Driven Development" is a prime contribution model in 2023+. The second key is: You actually need to care about the project. Tips for that:

1. Build something you are passionate about or that solves a real issue for you. It's not true that you need to contribute to large existing codebases to make a "legitimate open source contribution." If you build something you are a contributor. You can make your own backlog and grow your own community. That's not less impressive than the alternative, it's actually more impressive.
2. Contribute to a project that you already use and love, or alternatively: Use the project you are considering contributing too. You will understand the technical pain points, implementation approaches, and high-value added features much more effectively.

With those two keys, everything else will sort itself out. Specifically, when you talk to the community to understand what they actually want and one of two things will happen:

1. They will be awesome (Wow thanks so much for being willing to help! Here's what we're thinking, or did you want to propose something? We can even get on a call if it helps.)
2. They will not be awesome (Slow or no response, elitist or grumpy or unwilling to mentor - "this is too complicated for you" etc)

The second outcome is also great: You have learned to go elsewhere. Don't get stuck in the pitfall of trying to contribute to a specific project.

Another minor tip that I'm surprised not to have seen elsewhere is to keep an eye out for GitHub issues labeled "good first issue" and try to get involved in Hacktoberfest or FreeCodeCamp which are both OS-noobie friendly.

It's worth checking out the OS 101 guide from Open Sauced:

<https://opensauced.pizza/blog/open-source-101-a-beginner's-guide-to-getting-started>

I also maintain [ladderly.io](http://ladderly.io) which is open source and we have a bunch of open issues:

<https://github.com/Vandivier/ladderly-3>

> I want to treat my job search like a 9-5 job, where half the work day is spent building meaningful connections, applying strategically, and interview prepping...how I can refine the best way to begin my approach. What do you all think I can do?

This is an optimal strategy at a high level. Here are some tips to refine into the details:

1. Participate in communities across three community archetypes: <https://github.com/Vandivier/ladderly-slides/blob/main/docs/ENDORSED-COMMUNITIES.md>
2. Ensure you have a high-quality portfolio and resume. Your portfolio will be fine with as few as 3 projects it's not a volume game. Indeed has a free resume scanner. Make sure the ATS properly parses your education and years of experience.
   1. Through your job search feel free to A/B test changes. Make sure not to change it so rapidly that you can't get a reliable signal.
   2. Ceteris paribus, try to keep your resume to one page, black and white, standard fonts, no objective statement, hit major technical keywords 2-3x each.
   3. When spellings vary, consult Google Trends, eg "Full Stack Developer" not "Fullstack Developer." Treat your resume as an SEO game.
3. Leverage easy apply features and quality job boards to apply to 50-100 job posts per week if you are optimizing for rapid standard placement.
   1. Don't target a single company. Build bargaining power with authenticity and competition by targeting a company archetype that you care about by tech stack, industry, or a combination.
   2. If you are going for Tier 1 companies in particular, and willing to have a slower placement rate, reduce the application rate and focus on upfront networking to generate a referral.
   3. Social network at every company you apply to. Prior networking is ideal, but post-networking is also fine. Use demonstrated networking scripts and target the main three job families for contact: <https://github.com/Vandivier/ladderly-slides/blob/main/docs/NETWORKING-SCRIPTS.md>
4. Obtain over 500 Connections on LinkedIn. At this point LinkedIn just begins to show "500+" connections and the marginal opportunity benefits from network size diminish greatly. Ideal growth to this goal will be a natural side effect if you are following steps 1 and 3.
5. For DSA prep, see the Ladderly Leetcode Kata: <https://www.ladderly.io/blog/2023-11-25-leetcode-kata>