Career Advice About Startups

My goal is to become extremely efficient at coding. I want to build a reputation as someone who is able to deliver tons of high-quality implementation and products very quickly. I want to build actual velocity where the actual rate of code per hour/day is really high as opposed to just being able to accomplish more from working extra hours. What tactics can I use to level myself up in this way so that my old coding abilities feel unrecognizable when looking back 3-6 months in the future from my vast amount of improvement?

Alex and Rahul and the other senior people on Taro have consistently emphasized how important good software engineering fundamentals are to long-term career success as a software engineer. This is in contrast to learning the latest popular framework or area of development. Can people define what those fundamentals are and how one should go about acquiring/improving them? Thanks!

I work in as an iOS engineer. My current company is a startup that's scaling up fast. In classic startup fashion, testing was historically not a top priority here. As a consequence, we struggle with lots of manual QAing and low code confidence when modifying pieces of poorly tested legacy code. This has improved in the past year simply by unit testing every new piece of code by default and by introducing unit tests in legacy code as we touch it, boy scouting style. At this point, I think we need to step it up and I'm looking forward to formalising a testing strategy for our mobile team. Here are some ideas I have: In the realm of unit tests: - I want to introduce API contract tests because our back-end API lacks documentation. In these tests we'd unit test the way we build our requests to API endpoints, and we'd have a sample JSON response from the server to test that the app can parse it into our data models as expected. - I want to introduce localisation tests because our app supports many languages but we are always manually testing localisation. In these tests, we'd assert that the outputs of our formatting logic are the ones we want for different locales. In the realm of user interface tests: - I want to introduce snapshot testing, because right now the only way we can test that our views are rendered as expected for different view configurations (for example RTL vs LTR, empty content, loading content, content in verbose languages, etc.) is manually. - I want to introduce UI tests (sparingly, only for key flows) because we have no e2e tests. Currently, key flows are tested manually and frequently to prevent regressions, which takes lots of time. What other testing strategies can I propose to establish some standard we can use to further improve our code confidence, reduce bugs, and rely more on automated testing? How do the top tier tech companies approach mobile testing?

I recently started at my new gig as a remote tech lead. While I am on the West Coast, most of my team is either on the East Coast or in Europe (+11 hrs). Meetings start at around 7 AM PT and go on until 11:30 AM PT! Here is my challenge: I am a morning person & like to do more deep & undistracted work during the morning hours (Coding / Reading / Writing) . Screen time in the mornings usually drain me out & my productivity dips post multiple zoom / G-meet calls. What are your thoughts on how could I balance my sacred morning hour time between meetings & impactful work? Thanks!

Say a recruiter from Series C reaches out to you for a SWE role. What all are the questions that one should ask in order to do the understand the potential of the startup so that there is less risk of layoffs when joining there, given the uncertain times. I am aware of crunchbase website and looking at the news article that are linked there. What other homework one should during/before/after the interview process in terms of questions to ask, information to collect? The limitation that is usually is the startups have very few employees so it is difficult to get concrete answers about the culture, WLB, actual work unless you are in their network.

What can I do to get on the radar of senior engineers within the company and build respect for me overall? My company is also relatively small, so I'm fairly close with the CTO as well.

I have around 15 years experience with background mainly in Java, Restful, Springboot etc. I was impacted by layoffs and I am on a H1B. Hence I have limited time before which I should choose a job. I do not have extensive time for preparing LeetCode in this short time span. I would like to know if there are mid-level companies (not startups, not big tech) that do non-leetcode style interviews. Like, a take home assignment, or some other demo kind of interviews.

Fear/stomach-turning when I think about asking people for help (especially in public channels) has been a major blocker for me as a junior engineer.

Question was inspired by Alex's masterclass on side projects. In it, he talked about how he was able to get his role at Course Hero because it was a scrappy startup when he joined, and was willing to take bets. Do you have advice on how to find similar startups? And also connect with startup founders (and not get ghosted)? Some consequent questions: How do you know if a startup is scrappy or if it is shady/dysfunctional? Are there any resources on Taro to connect with founders? Thanks for any advice or help!

I'm a self-taught, aspiring Android engineer, looking to land my 1st full-time role. I have around 4 hours a day to learn software development, and I'm wondering how I can spend my time the most efficiently. Here are the 2 core things I want to understand how to balance my time between: DSA (data structures and algorithms) Building projects for portfolio

I've done a lot of research on how to be a good manager, but now do I just "trust the process" or how do I ensure we are a high performance team over the next half? I'm a newish EM at a Series-B start up of 150 people, ~25 engineers. So far I have positive feedback from my manager and reports that I am empathetic and supportive. What my manager is telling me now though is that we need to see results. Productivity and performance seem OK in my first months but it is too soon to really see my impact. My manager noted that since we have scaled up from 4 engineers to 25 and gone mostly remote over 3 years there may be a loss of a sense of urgency and the feeling of impact per dev. We are also split into many teams with a smaller scope per team. The temptation when asked to "get results" might be to ask for constant updates from developers and punish them when fake hard deadlines are given and missed (we are a B2C company so there are rarely actual deadlines). So how do I motivate my team to work hard in a healthy sustainable way? How do I measure the progress and reward them fairly while creating a team focused culture and not one that is competitive and individualist? Below are some of the management ideas I'm using/working towards. I have lots of room to learn how to do each better, so advice on which to prioritize my effort at improving first would be great in addition to notes on what's missing and what seems off on the list: Individual attention Working with each individual to set SMART goals for the next half Working with each individual to figure out what motivates them, and do that Figuring out what learning each person wants to do and giving them support there Regular, timely feedback (positive and negative) 1:1s where I do a lot of listening, help remove blocker Shielding from outside distraction and unhelpful pressures Team culture Creating a lowercase-a agile mindset: people are first and it is ok to fail and we learn from our mistakes. We can fail gracefully by making small, quick launches where we get frequent feedback from the users, and feedback from coworkers on how we are succeeding/failing Making the team effective first, efficient second: 5 wrong things done in a quarter are worse than 2 right things that move the needle Setting team OKRs for the next half that the team wants to accomplish Encouraging team work on tasks, pair programming, positive code review culture, etc Improving the process to make it effective and fun around how the flow of work happens between planning, selecting tasks, marking things as done and tested Team demos with stakeholders to show off results and get feedback Bonus questions about motivation: In 1:1s how do you figure out what motivates someone since they might not say extrinsic things like money even if that is what they are working for, or the opposite they might be happy at their level and just like the work they do with a good work life balance but might not say that directly either. Also if there is a team of 5 where 2 want money and 3 love the work for itself, how do you tailor their experience to that? The first two will still want fun/interesting work and the second three still want to get promoted and compensated fairly. Thanks!

I've gotten feedback that I'm more on the quiet side and that I could be more active in meetings. However, I feel like I don't have much to add when it comes to meetings. I want to say something that's insightful and adds value to the conversation, but I'm unsure how to come up with that level of material, especially on-the-spot during the meeting. How do I figure out what to say?

Hey John, I hope you are well. I am really passionate about CS (specifically Software Engineering) and I want to pursue a career in it. But I can't help but be a bit concerned about the future availability of coding jobs due to Al (chatgpt4 and stuff). I understand it's hard to predict how things will be in the next 10-15yrs, but my main concern is that I may be putting in all this hard work for nothing. I'm concerned Al will make my future job(s) obsolete before I even get it. Any thoughts on this? > > > If you build full "product skills" and use the best tools for the job, which today might be hand coding, but later may be Al guiding, you will probably be fine. > > I see....by "product skills" do you mean hard and soft skills? > > Software is just a tool to help accomplish something for people many programmers never understood that. Keep your eyes on the delivered value, and don't over focus on the specifics of the tools. Source: Saw the above discussion on twitter and it got me thinking with advent of ChatGpt4 and Github Copilot X, what can I do to not get negatively affected by this change. What are the various skills referred to as "product skills" mentioned in the above discussion and how should we go about developing them?

I'm moving forward to team matching at Meta for E4 and wanted to ask the community if they had any suggestions for teams with the strongest potential for growth, especially for the New York office. The recruiter gave me the following survey. I stated I'd be more of a "Product - Generalist" role. Would also be curious to learn more about "Systems - Generalist" as I did the System Design interview as well. In general from what I've seen, there's a decent amount of opportunity in Instagram, Whatsapp, and Reality Labs (from product announcements and earnings calls). I've also been told to avoid monetization as it's difficult to make an impact there. Would appreciate any advice or suggestions! Also would appreciate tips on what questions to ask Hiring Managers to assess how they grow E4s. What is your role? (select the one that applies) Systems - Generalist Product - Generalist What type of work motivates you the most? (select all that apply) Infra: Scaling challenges UX: Building user experiences Growth: Top of line impact Integrity: Ensuring platform safety Social Impact: Progressing positive change on key social issues Who do you want to build products for? (select all that apply) Consumers: External, individual users of the Meta family of apps Businesses: External business account users of Meta family of products Meta Employees: Users of internal tools Developers: Internal and external engineers using Meta developer products and APIs Please select which Meta Pillar(s) you’d be interested in joining? (select all that apply) Family of Apps: Enable optimized enforcement and support of account integrity to foster safe and meaningful communities. Monetization: Empower people and businesses to succeed in the global economy Gen AI: bring the transformative potential of generative AI to people and businesses Reality Labs: build tools that help people feel connected anytime, anywhere How would you rank your preference in terms of products? (feel free to use numbers) Facebook App Monetization Privacy Messenger Instagram WhatsApp Reality Labs (AR/VR)

Came across this post on CSCQ where the original poster asks about what these missing essential skills. One reply had me wondering, how I can actually learn these points: How to write things in a way that other people really understand what you're saying. How to structure code so that you can come back to it in 2 years and understand it. How to show off the work you've done. How much testing is the right amount, and not too much or too little.

My goal is to transition into a SWE role, but something I've struggled with is making the building of software projects more digestible. A lot of the time I'll look at some project I have to build, and I just don't know where to start or how to figure out what to do. Any tips on how to make this process less scary?

I am doing backend engineering for last 5 years in small sized startups. I am doing relatively decent with good work/learning and good salary. I am confused about future - since I have done bachelor’s only and that too from very very average tier 3 college in India so, do i need to go for masters from a reputed college to make my resume better for future. Is it even required to do masters or education from reputed college to grow in career or I am over thinking? Right now I don’t face any problem when I change companies but what about 10/15 years down the line. I am confused sometimes that do only skill matters or i need pedigree also to grow. I have decent skills but I don’t have a good college name in my resume what to do from here to grow: go for masters or focus on job and skills? If masters then: my another concern is do college degree in master really matters now as i will stop earning so, is it worth it or its just a FOMO?

I wanted to ask how do startup interviews generally work and in what ways do they differ from interviews at Big Tech companies?

I have been repeatedly told that I have a tendency to drop things when doing context switch between multiple tasks. How to manage my tasks effectively so that I can minimize this pattern?

I've recently been approached by a startup founder and asked to complete a take-home quiz, which I did. It looks like the founder is leaning towards offering me the Head of Technology position. However, I have a few concerns and questions. How can I assess if the founder is someone good to work with? From my initial conversations, I've noticed a few things about the founder: - They come across as overly confident, almost to the point of being condescending. Is this a common trait among founders, or should it be a red flag? - They strongly believe the product will be successful. I think this is a positive trait for a founder, but I'd like to get your opinions. - They think all backend jobs will be obsolete in two years due to AI. While speculation is fine, I believe there should be a balance with reasonableness. - They talk more about the history of AWS, the life of Elon Musk, and famous quotes rather than focusing on their own product. - They tend to underestimate the complexity of engineering feats. For example, they think developing services like DynamoDB and S3 was easy for Amazon because of their large workforce, which I find undermines the actual engineering challenges. How can I determine if the startup is likely to succeed? - What aspects should I be looking at? - What questions should I be asking the founder or team? Any insights or advice would be greatly appreciated!

I have about 5 YOE and trying to grow from Senior -> Staff engineer but noticing that the path is taking longer than I'd hope. This is the case whether I try to speak to other companies and ask about interviewing at that level or try to grow within my own company. Within my own company: Requirements unclear, seems to be more time based (just keep on shipping). Since we're on the smaller side, we don't have a clearly defined structure like FAANG. Externally: Due to the YOE, usually discussion of Staff isn't even an option even though I think I'm doing Staff level work. In fact, they usually decline the idea before even having a chance to explain what I'm working on. The projects I'm working on span the entire org (startup), I have multiple mentees, and org-wide impact. I will be honest and say that I don't think the projects I work on are necessarily insanely technically complex (not going out to millions of users, dealing with hyper concurrency issues, or needing to deal with large scalability issues), but they do have a large amount of scope and senior+ level management required to run them. I think from the project management perspective, I have things nailed down pretty well. So I wonder if I'm either missing... YOE - Just some sort of arbitrary minimum that is being placed across the board for certain levels to be achieved Technical expertise - I definitely admit that I'm not necessarily INSANELY technical. For example, I can admit gaps like: I don't know how to design a concurrent document editing system like Google docs, or I wouldn't be able to write a live streaming service without reading up on the proper documentation and understanding better how those systems work. Are things like this a requirement to be a staff engineer? To just be more aware or know right away how various systems like this are designed, without needing to do research beforehand? I'm essentially trying to understand what my gaps might be, and the technical aspect is one I'm unsure about how relevant it is. Would appreciate any thoughts, especially from Staff+ engineers, maybe sharing what they feel makes them a Staff vs a Senior and how much technical skills play a role vs other elements.

I'm pretty new to my company, so I've been asking questions and looking for "hand-holding" to bring myself up to speed. I've been having trouble ramping up though - My velocity hasn't been the best, and I've also gotten feedback that I need to be more independent as a senior engineer. This leaves me a bit confused - I know that in order to onboard, you need to seek out help aggressively and ask questions, but this seems opposite of the feedback around being more independent. How do I think about these 2 ideas? Should I just be working harder and spending more time figuring things out on my own?

I have worked at Meta my entire career (~5 years). I know that Meta is pretty "startup-ey" among the Big Tech companies, but I imagine that it can't mimic startups entirely and there's unique learning value startups can offer. Does switching to startups give big value to career development?