The recruiter scheduled a 30-minute interview for an introduction and discussed my work experience.
After the first interview, the recruiter sent me an NDA about the process. To continue, I needed to sign it. After signing, the recruiter sent me their take-home test, which is a medium-level task requiring a good knowledge of data structures for a suitable solution.
After finishing the take-home test, I sent the solution and waited several days for a response. The recruiter then scheduled an interview to discuss my solution with developers. During that interview, the developers also asked some technical questions outside the scope of the solution.
Following the technical interview, the recruiter scheduled an interview with the product team. To summarize this stage, they wanted to see if I could integrate as a software developer with their product team. They stated that even with technical problems, they make the final decision.
Several days later, the recruiter contacted me with an update, informing me that I was rejected. According to the recruiter, the developers I interviewed gave me and my solution a perfect score. The product team, who are the decision-makers of the process, gave no feedback. It appears that developers are not considered first-class citizens.
Why did you use this framework?
The following metrics were computed from 2 interview experiences for the Miro Senior Backend Engineer role in Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Miro's interview process for their Senior Backend Engineer roles in Amsterdam, Netherlands is fairly selective, failing a large portion of engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having mixed feelings for Miro's Senior Backend Engineer interview process in Amsterdam, Netherlands.