Pay Benefits Time off Many opportunities to move around
Constantly changing procedures. High case load. Low recognition. No consistency. Low team morale. Nobody willing to help. This is not an HR role anymore.
If you value having a high-paying job, this is it! Other than that, there is nothing special about the role. They took a simple job and overcomplicated it and never asked us for our opinions.
New processes almost weekly because "the regulators" say so, but no explanations are given.
You will be handling mostly customer-related cases where the customer is mad at every little thing.
This role is lucky to have any type of "HR" work to it.
Management does not seem to care about the numerous redundant processes in place.
Good luck trying to get anything more than meeting expectations, even though they assign three new cases each week on top of your already growing caseload.
EXTREMELY micromanaged by managers who have been there too long.
Get rid of the directors currently there and bring in new, fresh talent that can see things from a different lens.
Diversify the director team.
Allow all investigators to work the same types of cases, and not hand-pick who you want handling the “HR” related cases.
The process was very comfortable, given it was done by phone for both sets of interviews. Questions about skills and experience were very straightforward, and the interviewers were really easy to talk to.
I got an interview with a tech support team through a staffing agency. The recruiter told me the tech team was having a hard time finding someone with at least 2 years of experience in various SQL language works for 36k a year. So the team said they
First, a call from HR to confirm the number of years of experience (which were already on my CV). Then a technical round with what looks to be a manager and two senior developers. The worst interview I ever had: questions were really badly explaine
The process was very comfortable, given it was done by phone for both sets of interviews. Questions about skills and experience were very straightforward, and the interviewers were really easy to talk to.
I got an interview with a tech support team through a staffing agency. The recruiter told me the tech team was having a hard time finding someone with at least 2 years of experience in various SQL language works for 36k a year. So the team said they
First, a call from HR to confirm the number of years of experience (which were already on my CV). Then a technical round with what looks to be a manager and two senior developers. The worst interview I ever had: questions were really badly explaine